<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Models for John Lewis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/</link>
	<description>Fashion, Lifestyle, and Humor for the Plus Sized Woman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethelene Morlas</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-344945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethelene Morlas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-344945</guid>
		<description>o,So pretty,This is such an amazing series.Love all you website…I’m in such a happy place watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o,So pretty,This is such an amazing series.Love all you website…I’m in such a happy place watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivien Greene</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-342477</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivien Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-342477</guid>
		<description>Great article, and many thanks for taking the time to publish it; I&#039;m sure other readers benefited too. It really opened my eyes for some new conclusions that I hadn&#039;t thought of before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, and many thanks for taking the time to publish it; I&#8217;m sure other readers benefited too. It really opened my eyes for some new conclusions that I hadn&#8217;t thought of before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponytail</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponytail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Any reason John Lewis aren&#039;t using the new model at their flagship store ? &#039;Cause I&#039;ve been to Peterborough and I can&#039;t imagine anyone thinks a revolution is going to start there. It would have been a much better idea to put the new mannequins in their largest store, upfront, where more people could have seen it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any reason John Lewis aren&#8217;t using the new model at their flagship store ? &#8216;Cause I&#8217;ve been to Peterborough and I can&#8217;t imagine anyone thinks a revolution is going to start there. It would have been a much better idea to put the new mannequins in their largest store, upfront, where more people could have seen it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stickler</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stickler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>&quot;The current mannequins used by John Lewis are equivilant to a US size 10.&quot;

I agree with everyhting... but surely you meant &quot;equivalent&quot;?

Hooray for bigger models and for better spelling! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The current mannequins used by John Lewis are equivilant to a US size 10.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with everyhting&#8230; but surely you meant &#8220;equivalent&#8221;?</p>
<p>Hooray for bigger models and for better spelling! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>By the way, given her height (5&#039;8&quot;) and the BMI they&#039;re stating, her weight must 130 pounds.

I think there is some confusion over British and US sizes in this entry, too. The &quot;bigger&quot; models they are &lt;i&gt;planning&lt;/i&gt; to use in the future are &lt;i&gt;British&lt;/i&gt; size 10, which is an American 6 or 8, so, nothing that spectacular, really, for non-catwalk models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, given her height (5&#8217;8&#8243;) and the BMI they&#8217;re stating, her weight must 130 pounds.</p>
<p>I think there is some confusion over British and US sizes in this entry, too. The &#8220;bigger&#8221; models they are <i>planning</i> to use in the future are <i>British</i> size 10, which is an American 6 or 8, so, nothing that spectacular, really, for non-catwalk models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=437057&amp;in_page_id=1879&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here it is!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=437057&amp;in_page_id=1879" rel="nofollow">Here it is!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Size 12 isn’t big. It’s still quite slim.”&lt;/i&gt;  Well, duh.  Especially considering most models are between 5&#039;9&quot; and 6&#039; tall, a size 12 is quite slim at that height.  Pardon my foul language, but welcome to the real world, dipshit.

Em - where did you find that article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Size 12 isn’t big. It’s still quite slim.”</i>  Well, duh.  Especially considering most models are between 5&#8217;9&#8243; and 6&#8242; tall, a size 12 is quite slim at that height.  Pardon my foul language, but welcome to the real world, dipshit.</p>
<p>Em &#8211; where did you find that article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2007/09/24/new-models-for-john-lewis/#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>The spokesman was quoted in Daily Mail saying that her BMI is 19. I mean, HELLO, she&#039;s one bout of diarrhea away from being &quot;morbidly underweight&quot; courtesy of the much-cited WHO! And they were &quot;astonished&quot;, no less, that she&#039;s &quot;quite slim&quot;! 
&quot;The photographs show you can be size 12 and be healthy and beautiful.&quot; Really? Healthy? That fat pig? Astonishing! And they had to fly her in all the way from South Africa because you couldn&#039;t find a model so huge anwhere in the UK? Have you &lt;i&gt;seen&lt;/i&gt; that girl? Would you even have noticed that she&#039;s supposed to be bigger than other models? There&#039;s an army of catalog and lingerie models all over Europe who are exactly her size, or bigger.

This makes me so mad, every time. Like all these suposedly body-positive articles you find in women&#039;s magazines recently, about women who embrace their fat, imperfect selves at a voluptuous, overweight 130 pounds. I&#039;d rather keep looking at starving size zero models forever than stand this hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spokesman was quoted in Daily Mail saying that her BMI is 19. I mean, HELLO, she&#8217;s one bout of diarrhea away from being &#8220;morbidly underweight&#8221; courtesy of the much-cited WHO! And they were &#8220;astonished&#8221;, no less, that she&#8217;s &#8220;quite slim&#8221;!<br />
&#8220;The photographs show you can be size 12 and be healthy and beautiful.&#8221; Really? Healthy? That fat pig? Astonishing! And they had to fly her in all the way from South Africa because you couldn&#8217;t find a model so huge anwhere in the UK? Have you <i>seen</i> that girl? Would you even have noticed that she&#8217;s supposed to be bigger than other models? There&#8217;s an army of catalog and lingerie models all over Europe who are exactly her size, or bigger.</p>
<p>This makes me so mad, every time. Like all these suposedly body-positive articles you find in women&#8217;s magazines recently, about women who embrace their fat, imperfect selves at a voluptuous, overweight 130 pounds. I&#8217;d rather keep looking at starving size zero models forever than stand this hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

