Because I don’t wear a 39.5.
Miu Miu bi-color satin pumps under $200 smackeroonies, at net-a-porter.
Oh, and SPEAKING of Prada remember how yesterday I showed you those wacky ruffle shoes that I’ve loved since February and said were going to be all over the place? Check out this month’s Harper’s and remember who told you first.
hm…maybe it’s just me, but i dont’ remember yesterday’s Prada revelation! I’d love to see it, though.
Comment by gina — June 17, 2008 @ 10:01 am
I LOVE those Miu Mius! Oh, those are gorgeous. I wish I wore a 39.5.
I can’t stop looking at them! I don’t know exactly what it is about them but they are mighty special.
Comment by Brooke — June 17, 2008 @ 10:31 am
GOOD GOD THOSE ARE BEAUTIFUL
Comment by Violet — June 17, 2008 @ 10:48 am
Breathtaking.
Comment by Francesca — June 17, 2008 @ 10:58 am
The poor, big-footed, non-heel-wearing girl’s version:
http://www.zappos.com/n/p/p/7290814/c/754.html
A paltry reflection of the beauty of the Miu Mius, obviously.
Comment by Pavonian — June 17, 2008 @ 11:54 am
I have those trotters, and actually like them a bit better. Believe it or not. They are a classic spectator, whereas these are satin, and I’m just not crazy about satin shoes. I would, however, wrestle Plumcake to the ground for the ruffle-y Prada she’s posted up top.
Comment by Chaser — June 17, 2008 @ 1:21 pm
I DO wear a 39.5, and I’ve looked at those many a time and up until now I have had the sense to not buy myself white satin shoes. But my common sense is not something that can be counted on long-term…
Comment by Style Spy — June 18, 2008 @ 8:44 am