<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Princess Seamy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/</link>
	<description>Fashion, Lifestyle, and Humor for the Plus Sized Woman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rural Juror</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-38959</link>
		<dc:creator>Rural Juror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-38959</guid>
		<description>I have to side with the crowd on this one. I had a skirt that would have matched this, back in the 80&#039;s, and it&#039;s probably the garment I look back on with the most shame. This jacket looks extremely cheap to me. It would not be worth $0.50 of the American dollars. To me. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to side with the crowd on this one. I had a skirt that would have matched this, back in the 80&#8242;s, and it&#8217;s probably the garment I look back on with the most shame. This jacket looks extremely cheap to me. It would not be worth $0.50 of the American dollars. To me. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimiks</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-38065</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimiks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-38065</guid>
		<description>I have to simply say Honey, NO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to simply say Honey, NO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La BellaDonna</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-37327</link>
		<dc:creator>La BellaDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-37327</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing inherently wrong with shoulder pads, ladies.  They&#039;re not a sin - neither mortal nor even venial.  Shoulder pads &lt;i&gt;in moderation&lt;/i&gt; have been recommended by dressmaking manuals &lt;b&gt;for decades&lt;/b&gt; for helping to balance out a figure, and for making shoulders even, and for making garments hang properly.  They&#039;re a dressmaking tool - no more, no less.  Zippers and buttons aren&#039;t sinful, either.

And this blouse is a perfectly nice design, in its own right.  I don&#039;t think the pads chosen are the right ones for this fabric, and the fabric itself doesn&#039;t appeal to me, but the additional seams make it easier to fit, and the colour division emphasizes the feminine shape - nothing wrong with that, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with shoulder pads, ladies.  They&#8217;re not a sin &#8211; neither mortal nor even venial.  Shoulder pads <i>in moderation</i> have been recommended by dressmaking manuals <b>for decades</b> for helping to balance out a figure, and for making shoulders even, and for making garments hang properly.  They&#8217;re a dressmaking tool &#8211; no more, no less.  Zippers and buttons aren&#8217;t sinful, either.</p>
<p>And this blouse is a perfectly nice design, in its own right.  I don&#8217;t think the pads chosen are the right ones for this fabric, and the fabric itself doesn&#8217;t appeal to me, but the additional seams make it easier to fit, and the colour division emphasizes the feminine shape &#8211; nothing wrong with that, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verelle</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-37234</link>
		<dc:creator>Verelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-37234</guid>
		<description>yes! i&#039;d be afraid with that shape of seaming that an apple would look like a basketball</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes! i&#8217;d be afraid with that shape of seaming that an apple would look like a basketball</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth K</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-37164</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-37164</guid>
		<description>Uh no. I used to work with a very apple shaped woman and she had a top that looked very much like this. It was not in the least bit flattering. It made her look like a giant beach ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh no. I used to work with a very apple shaped woman and she had a top that looked very much like this. It was not in the least bit flattering. It made her look like a giant beach ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virago</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-36978</link>
		<dc:creator>Virago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-36978</guid>
		<description>Oh, bad call. Horrible fabric, shoulder pads (SHOULDER PADS?) cheap buttons, and princess seams really, really don&#039;t work on apples. On hourglasses, hell yeah, but apples? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, bad call. Horrible fabric, shoulder pads (SHOULDER PADS?) cheap buttons, and princess seams really, really don&#8217;t work on apples. On hourglasses, hell yeah, but apples? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jm</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-36974</link>
		<dc:creator>jm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-36974</guid>
		<description>you know, it&#039;s not for me, but i can really see it on the right person. I think it could be great on an apple. I think the big problem here is that the model is so not a big girl that it&#039;s hard to even imagine it. I guess this really goes back to having models that people can relate to, and models that the companies think will &quot;sell&quot; may not always be ones that sell to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, it&#8217;s not for me, but i can really see it on the right person. I think it could be great on an apple. I think the big problem here is that the model is so not a big girl that it&#8217;s hard to even imagine it. I guess this really goes back to having models that people can relate to, and models that the companies think will &#8220;sell&#8221; may not always be ones that sell to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-36943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-36943</guid>
		<description>Star Trek!  That&#039;s why I like it! I always wanted to be an officer aboard the Starship Enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek!  That&#8217;s why I like it! I always wanted to be an officer aboard the Starship Enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmme</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-36699</link>
		<dc:creator>emmme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-36699</guid>
		<description>Francesca, no more late-night Designing Women marathons!
But seriously, I love you. And that blouse is terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francesca, no more late-night Designing Women marathons!<br />
But seriously, I love you. And that blouse is terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabrab</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/comment-page-1/#comment-36662</link>
		<dc:creator>rabrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/2008/08/12/princess-seamy/#comment-36662</guid>
		<description>From a purely practical, how-would-it-fit standpoint, I found it troublesome that it is noted that this is &quot;designed to be very fitted&quot;, but there is no way to determine what the waist size on it is. It doesn&#039;t look like it would fit an &quot;apple&quot;, since that&#039;s generally defined as something like: &quot;waist the same size as, or bigger than bust.&quot; This is clearly much narrower in the waist than the bust. But How Much Narrower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a purely practical, how-would-it-fit standpoint, I found it troublesome that it is noted that this is &#8220;designed to be very fitted&#8221;, but there is no way to determine what the waist size on it is. It doesn&#8217;t look like it would fit an &#8220;apple&#8221;, since that&#8217;s generally defined as something like: &#8220;waist the same size as, or bigger than bust.&#8221; This is clearly much narrower in the waist than the bust. But How Much Narrower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

