The original Uggs, as we all know, are too terrible to picture here on a Monday.
Their more grown-up styles are not all bad. Some are even pretty good, if you need something warm.
See? This one adjusts to fit wide calves and has a sheepskin lining. The stylish girl in the cold region could do much worse than to wear these in the depths of February.
But for the Spring? Uggs?
Um, what?
No no no no NO!
Even masked in florals, an Ugg is still an Ugg.
I had a ruffly tiered skirt in 1991 that had almost that exact floral print. It was made by Bongo and I was very disappointed that my mom didn’t let me also get the matching jean jacket.
Comment by Amy K. — February 23, 2009 @ 12:40 pm
I covet that first pair.
The second may give me nightmares.
That is all.
Comment by Twistie — February 23, 2009 @ 1:39 pm
Dear God, woman, give us some sort of warning before you post something like that. Some of us are still recovering from the weekend.
Comment by daisyj — February 23, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
I too covet the first pair.
I live in Sweden, in the northern part. We easily get -19 C and I live in a town by the sea so it gets even colder.
Those looked like a perfect fit for me.
Wonder if they sell them in Sweden?
Comment by Ravna — February 23, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
How appropriate is it that Uggs are called Uggs. Uggggly?
Comment by jamy — February 23, 2009 @ 6:26 pm
Bongo! Oh no! I remember that! I have a pair of Uggs, but mine lace up the front and are a bit more… “stylish” I suppose, only donning them in the coldest of weather I can take. I say what I can take (cause its Cali and cold is nothing compared to the east coast)
These florals are hideous! and beg the question WTF? hahahahaha… I Love you all!
Comment by Marie Denee — February 24, 2009 @ 1:01 pm
UGGSFORCHEAP is a large online store which retail UGGS and wholesale UGGS, Come here to buy a pair of lavish &luxury UGGS BOOT with the lowest price.
Comment by ugg — August 15, 2009 @ 3:01 am
You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with
Comment by puma shoes — October 31, 2009 @ 2:06 am