<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Response to Plumcake&#8217;s Question of Yesterday&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/</link>
	<description>Fashion, Lifestyle, and Humor for the Plus Sized Woman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose K</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-236504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-236504</guid>
		<description>Oh- I did something wrong, my browser didn&#039;t save my post. I was saying I am glad  this kind of talk is going on, about the real deal! i saw a news story about it at yahoo, too, I&#039;m glad people are beign honest about this issue!


Saw a blog post about it at Plus Size Clothing Mag, too, they were talking about lack of plus size models in Beneton ads, and true &quot;diversity&quot;  curious to know your opinion about it too--

It&#039;s here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plus-size-clothing-magazine.com/news/curvy-girl-its-your-time-too-benetton-wants-fresh-faces-for-fall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.plus-size-clothing-magazine.com/news/curvy-girl-its-your-time-too-benetton-wants-fresh-faces-for-fall&lt;/a&gt;

Rose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh- I did something wrong, my browser didn&#8217;t save my post. I was saying I am glad  this kind of talk is going on, about the real deal! i saw a news story about it at yahoo, too, I&#8217;m glad people are beign honest about this issue!</p>
<p>Saw a blog post about it at Plus Size Clothing Mag, too, they were talking about lack of plus size models in Beneton ads, and true &#8220;diversity&#8221;  curious to know your opinion about it too&#8211;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.plus-size-clothing-magazine.com/news/curvy-girl-its-your-time-too-benetton-wants-fresh-faces-for-fall/" rel="nofollow">http://www.plus-size-clothing-magazine.com/news/curvy-girl-its-your-time-too-benetton-wants-fresh-faces-for-fall</a></p>
<p>Rose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeanM</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-235177</link>
		<dc:creator>JeanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-235177</guid>
		<description>While I agree 100% about the need for more diversity in this group, one argument against Gabourey Sidibe being included is that I don&#039;t see her lasting in the industry.  She&#039;s an incredible actress, but do any of you see any other roles that she could take on in Hollywood as it is now?  She&#039;s incredible, but I don&#039;t think she&#039;s going to be the future of Hollywood any more than most of the actors from Slumdog Millionaire last year.  They were perfect for that role, but aren&#039;t versatile enough for lasting success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree 100% about the need for more diversity in this group, one argument against Gabourey Sidibe being included is that I don&#8217;t see her lasting in the industry.  She&#8217;s an incredible actress, but do any of you see any other roles that she could take on in Hollywood as it is now?  She&#8217;s incredible, but I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s going to be the future of Hollywood any more than most of the actors from Slumdog Millionaire last year.  They were perfect for that role, but aren&#8217;t versatile enough for lasting success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Rang</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234979</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Rang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234979</guid>
		<description>My first thought was how in the world could they have left out the beautiful young woman who starred in Precious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought was how in the world could they have left out the beautiful young woman who starred in Precious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graciela</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234959</link>
		<dc:creator>graciela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with La BellaDonna&#039;s comments.

I have no issue with thin white women, the problem is that that&#039;s the only standard of beauty. Thin, curvy, black, white, whatever, diversity is beautiful. And even though VF isn&#039;t showing it here on the magazine, I think Hollywood itself is making some strides to represent other races, nationalities, and body types. Of course it&#039;s not without its problems but I&#039;d like to give some credit to the fact that I can see an Indian man, a beautiful black woman, a curvy latina, along side lily-white women in Hollywood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with La BellaDonna&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>I have no issue with thin white women, the problem is that that&#8217;s the only standard of beauty. Thin, curvy, black, white, whatever, diversity is beautiful. And even though VF isn&#8217;t showing it here on the magazine, I think Hollywood itself is making some strides to represent other races, nationalities, and body types. Of course it&#8217;s not without its problems but I&#8217;d like to give some credit to the fact that I can see an Indian man, a beautiful black woman, a curvy latina, along side lily-white women in Hollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdegraffen</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234938</link>
		<dc:creator>mdegraffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234938</guid>
		<description>I understand this story is going to be on ET tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand this story is going to be on ET tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildflower</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234783</link>
		<dc:creator>wildflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234783</guid>
		<description>Now that I think about it, there&#039;s something else weird going on here... these girls may be all young, thin, and white, but for heaven&#039;s sake, not all thin white people look alike! Why were they dressed and made up to look like they are in uniform instead of celebrating the differences even among them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I think about it, there&#8217;s something else weird going on here&#8230; these girls may be all young, thin, and white, but for heaven&#8217;s sake, not all thin white people look alike! Why were they dressed and made up to look like they are in uniform instead of celebrating the differences even among them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La BellaDonna</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234744</link>
		<dc:creator>La BellaDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234744</guid>
		<description>I will be in the front ranks criticizing HOLLYWOOD for its horrific and artificial standards imposed on both the women who work there and the women who watch the work.  However, I&#039;d prefer that we not criticize the women&#039;s bodies.  The implication is that it&#039;s OK to criticize THEM because they&#039;re THIN.  No. If it isn&#039;t right to criticize women just because they&#039;re fat, it isn&#039;t right to criticize women just because they&#039;re THIN, either.  I don&#039;t want to merely exchange one &quot;WRONG&quot; way for women to look for a different &quot;WRONG&quot; way for women to look.  I don&#039;t want the women who are naturally thin to see reflections of their bodies on those covers and hear, &quot;Oh, you look anorexic!&quot; They&#039;re the only ones who will recognize their bodies on that cover; the women who ARE anorexic, generally speaking, will not.

I want to see more DIVERSITY, I don&#039;t want people told that there&#039;s something wrong with their looks because they&#039;re lily-white, or because they&#039;re thinner than I&#039;ll ever be.  I want to see all different sizes and ages and ethnicities on a &quot;New Hollywood&quot; cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be in the front ranks criticizing HOLLYWOOD for its horrific and artificial standards imposed on both the women who work there and the women who watch the work.  However, I&#8217;d prefer that we not criticize the women&#8217;s bodies.  The implication is that it&#8217;s OK to criticize THEM because they&#8217;re THIN.  No. If it isn&#8217;t right to criticize women just because they&#8217;re fat, it isn&#8217;t right to criticize women just because they&#8217;re THIN, either.  I don&#8217;t want to merely exchange one &#8220;WRONG&#8221; way for women to look for a different &#8220;WRONG&#8221; way for women to look.  I don&#8217;t want the women who are naturally thin to see reflections of their bodies on those covers and hear, &#8220;Oh, you look anorexic!&#8221; They&#8217;re the only ones who will recognize their bodies on that cover; the women who ARE anorexic, generally speaking, will not.</p>
<p>I want to see more DIVERSITY, I don&#8217;t want people told that there&#8217;s something wrong with their looks because they&#8217;re lily-white, or because they&#8217;re thinner than I&#8217;ll ever be.  I want to see all different sizes and ages and ethnicities on a &#8220;New Hollywood&#8221; cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234724</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234724</guid>
		<description>@wildflower True dat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wildflower True dat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildflower</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234720</link>
		<dc:creator>wildflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234720</guid>
		<description>Well, you can&#039;t fault VF for choosing all YOUNG women. They are, after all, talking about the &quot;New Hollywood,&quot; which definitely implies a generational shift.

In addition to them all being similar-looking, something else bugs me... it&#039;s the schoolgirl clothes and the ankle socks. These ladies are all--what--late teens to late 20&#039;s? So why are they dressed like little schoolgirls? It sort of heebie-jeebies me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can&#8217;t fault VF for choosing all YOUNG women. They are, after all, talking about the &#8220;New Hollywood,&#8221; which definitely implies a generational shift.</p>
<p>In addition to them all being similar-looking, something else bugs me&#8230; it&#8217;s the schoolgirl clothes and the ankle socks. These ladies are all&#8211;what&#8211;late teens to late 20&#8242;s? So why are they dressed like little schoolgirls? It sort of heebie-jeebies me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemdiva</title>
		<link>http://manolobig.com/2010/02/03/in-response-to-plumcakes-question-of-yesterday/comment-page-1/#comment-234701</link>
		<dc:creator>gemdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobig.com/?p=4184#comment-234701</guid>
		<description>Looks like a group portrait from the eating disorder unit of your local mental health clinic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a group portrait from the eating disorder unit of your local mental health clinic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

